-
Posts
861 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
39
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Latest X-Plane & Community News
Events
Downloads
Store
Posts posted by Michael_Chang
-
-
We'll actually be refraining from any new liveries for the time being, and will be waiting for Elanport to finish his textures for the plane
-
strange.... that's actually a 767-300 non ER with winglets... i didn't think that existed... also, that would make this one's model name "AW" not BWL
-
-
My entire 787 fleet
it looks so nice with the anti-alias turned on
-
-
same here
-
-
-
-
It still amazes me JAL did not add lie-flat seats to their business class section, but your recreation looks brilliant. Keep up the good work!
-Orcair
lol thanks, but credits really should go to william, he designed them and modelled them in sketchup, all i did was make a texture palate for them
-
I meant on aircraft, because there is a point where that many polygons is useless and won't really enhance the plane's appearance any further, so capping it would help those *ahem* me* with crappy computers fly the planes as well.
-
-
care to justify why we shouldn't cap it?
-
-
So as you all know, I like FSX conversions, and one of the reasons, is that they are so lo-poly and yet they can still look nice! I found out, about a year ago, that FSX actually has a limit imposed on it's modellers of 60000 polygons on their exteriors and interiors, so that the plane can run smoothly in the sim and i was thinking, why can't we put a limit of say, 70000 polygons on the exterior and 80000 polygons on the interior? it's perfectly reasonable and definitely won't affect the overall appearance of the aircraft.
Just as an example, the CRJ-200 is around 100000 polygons in total
-
lol yeah, kinda late colin XD
-
2
-
-
Good I run the Crj-200 at 30 fps.
perfect
we're waiting on elanport to deliver a brand new set of textures, which will be amazing
-
1
-
-
if you can run the CRJ or the Challenger-300, you shouldn't have too much trouble handling my aircraft.
-
Looks amazing mike. Hows the frame rate? How would it perform on older machines? I hope its not like the 777 which can become painfully slow.
I'm designing this plane on X-plane 9, with a macbook 2009, if i can run it, anyone can.
-
1
-
-
Much excitement there is being! Eport Aviation graphics' elanport has agreed to help me with my 787's new textures
-
-
not quite yet, we have yet to make the system perfect
-
Hello All! I'm getting sporadic reports that my 767 is having weird COG or Airfoil issues in Version 10, about 10% of the users (including myself) of my planes report that the plane goes into full elevator trim up when on approach and still can't shoot the approach properly. They also report very hard takeoffs and almost impossible maintenance of flight. If anyone can diagnose this issue, please let me know.
This problem seems to only arise in V10
-
FSXP Website
in General Discussion
Posted
guys guys guys, let's keep this peaceful, I'm sure that peter will fix things, i'll help him when i don't have excessive ammounts of chemistry homework