Michael_Chang
-
Posts
861 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
39
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Latest X-Plane & Community News
Events
Downloads
Store
Posts posted by Michael_Chang
-
-
hey guys! Hiroshi just got back to me regarding the 757, in his own words "seems okay" which is quite amazing, coming from him XD
in any case, he did find a few issues.
According to Hiroshi, ramzzess designed those two flaps to be flush against the wing, when the second flap should actually not be touching it.
He also noted, the starboard forward door is too large, they aren't in fact symmetrical, the one on the right is smaller than the one on the left
He also commented on the height of the landing gears, which ramzzess has already acknowledged.
That is all.
-
1
-
-
Just a normal 767-300 Livery like the real one (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Air.canada.b767-300.c-ggfj.2.jpg).
The Windows are sometimes on the wrong spot and sometimes just not aligned. And the Engines are not in the Air Canada Green.
Thanks for you help!!
air canada flies 4 or 5 types of 767, the 767-300ER GE AL, BL and PW AL and BL
-
please, please, please, upgrade your texture resolution, other than that, a well executed takeoff, just out of curiosity, why are your flap sets so high?
-
just wondering do you have a release date for the 787 yet?
I'd like to say early-mid 2014, but that's no guarantee, because the stupid theif who stole my computer is making it hard
-
this guy has the best parents ever.
-
Where is this? Which plane is this? So many questions so little answers...
can you please GTFO? how many ways can we tell you that we DON'T WANT YOU HERE? You've repeatedly created spam accounts whose original purpose has been forgotten in your vain attempts to tease the members of this forum. You also lack the subtlety to convince the population here that you are in fact a new comer. Here's a tip, if you're gonna come back here again, which we all BEG you not to, come back under an alias who shuts up, sits down, and tries to assimilate instead of standing out like a sore thumb, and NOT in the good way. I thought you were an okay kid, and even would've argued in your defense when your name was still a320, but all of these accounts are just ridiculous. LEAVE.
and yes, to those who insist on criticizing, i'm aware of the irony in this post.
-
3
-
-
All I was trying to say there was that you only need 64 polygons to make a smooth cylinder and it looked like you were using 128 also if you load up everything on the B-29 right now it adds up to be around 1,250,100 polygons including old un-polygon optimized areas and things i need to delete as well as the fact that some things have subdivision surfaces that are not applied yet so i can easily control that number to make it lower or higher
Also if memory serves me right It would be pretty impressive if you managed to make the entire interior of a md-80 with 450,000 poly's
I would also like to point out that there may be a typo in that post i had to assume that the "not I" was supposed to be "now I" or "I do not" as otherwise the sentence made no sense
I like to use 72 polygons (on the fokker which i worked on, i used 72, as well as on the tupolev 214) because it sets an easy number of degrees per vertex
-
1
-
-
Hey guys! go check out our Poll on Facebook regarding liveries! Matt is currently doing exams, however, we'd like to know what you'd like to see next on the 787. Some of these liveries already existed for previous models of the 787, however all the paints listed have not been updated to the HD format being used right now
FSXP Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/pages/FSXP/406978739369330
-
2
-
-
I had the same problem
try these steps:
1. turn off texture compression
2. increase texture resolution
"I've had a look at the png containing the glareshied (_PanelTrans) and it's equally fuzzy,"
-
Just a little thing that I noticed - the red line on the front gear bay door should be a lot closer to the actual gear.
Assuming the plane is at Zero weight, then most of these shots are correct, however, yes, the plane does sit a little lower, but the distance is neglible
-
PWNED noob ... FAIL
Idk, oblivion does have a converted L-1011 which looks pretty close, though I understand that you're attempting levity, it is sometimes hard to distinguish in the language of "type"
-
1
-
-
I was working on a 3d cabin with that guy, also was providing assistance with the cockpit, but then we lost contact
-
One more
i'm not 100% familiar with this jet, but what is that awkward angle on the inner portion of the outboard second flap?
-
I don't know if any of you know this woman, but I find her hilarious, despite her frequent use of racial stereotypes and sexual humor. She portrays various airline stewardesses, her name, Pam Ann
-
At the time of recording at the ramp in the beginning of the video, the plane was nearly fully loaded.
yikes, then he needs to work on the gear dynamics... like a lot...
-
1
-
-
this one's a significant step up from the 777-200LR, though peter's right, the gear compression is way too high, the legs are the right length, but the gears should be compressed more, even at zero weight. Tire size for the main gears is correct, but the nose gear should be a bit larger and closer together. Also, there's cargo doors on the left side, there shouldn't be, and that's about it really, this one really looks nice!
for reference, this is a 757 at almost zero extra weight
-
4
-
-
Aren't Michaels freeware planes only 2D and very low quality, why is he bashing SSG's masterpiece. The 170 and 190 are amazing compared to all the 2D crap for download on the internet.
don't ask a question. figure out for yourself
the planes are ready to try, and i'll be the first to admit the panels on my 767's suck.-
1
-
-
Howard, Don't go around bashing others if you can't even maintain your own image. Seriously, when I tell you to stop using and distributing my 777, you accuse me of stalking, threaten to "arrest" me, and then block me on facebook. Then, you return, add me as a friend and start kissing my ass like it's no one's business. Stop flip-flopping. if you're going to have any thoughts or feelings towards me, pick one and stay it. Another thing, thus far, all you've proven to me is that you know how to talk. Stop throwing empty threats at people and bragging about your skills.
That is all.
In other news, Matthew Huerta has re-done the United 787 livery (as seen on our facebook page) here it is!
-
2
-
-
Howard. I got two words for you. Prove it.
-
A lot of these factors can be addressed by modifying your settings in XP. As for the VC stuff, having been a former flightgearer, I can vouch for the fact that these cockpits are much nicer.
-
1
-
-
Another shot by Matthew!
-
2
-
-
Not exactly what I flew, but I really want to share this pic XD
-
6
-
-
Matthew is churning out beautiful paints for us! this is probably is best one yet!
-
2
-
-
As these screens show, Matt and Peter are still hard at work to make this plane better, with Peter working on a surprise for all of us and Matt pushing out new paints!
-
2
-
757 series for X-Plane 10 by ramzzess&philipp
in General Discussion
Posted
Harry, you try to create one the same or better, you're arguing against me using remarks that are completely irrelevant. Just because I can't do better doesn't mean I can't middle man for Mr. Igami's criticisms, which are all constructive, provide fix options and are well informed and accurate. I've discussed multiple times with him about coming here to offer up his own insights, however given the attitude towards criticism in this forum, he'd probably get a LOT of hate. One doesn't need building talent to find know how to compare the model to the real aircraft.
On a slightly different note, I am glad that we see eye-to-eye on my 767 (which I assume is the one you are talking about)