Japo32
JRollon-
Posts
1,579 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
27
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Latest X-Plane & Community News
Events
Downloads
Store
Everything posted by Japo32
-
hehe... .... Well good news... the plane followed the flight plan correctly. Even I created some flight plans and it made it. Still it is not connected the STARs pages so I had to land visually becuase also it is not connected the radios. All those missing pages are programmed but not put on their right positions (have to create the pages on fms that are only text pages.. but have to create them...) So I made a short flight from Salamanca to Barajas in Madrid.. and did it right!. Even with wind it followed the right course to maintain it. tourbulences.. and 1/2 banks was tested and ok.. perfect. Altitude modes (perfect all). What it needs? clean lots of dirty little things.. that are fast to be done one by one but there are lots of them.. so still have to wait. How long?.. don't expect on next month or maybe August. If we do it sooner then better.. but I know this things takes its time.. and it is not time right now to throw all work to dust. Ok.. here are some screens like they are on my x-plane 9.55... reaching Barajas.. It was a live flight where I was showing Anton how it was going on real time video. We were very glad at the end. A big Hurra for the first official complete test flight of the CRJ. Hurra!! ;D Reaching perales.. Making the visual landing. Very very very smooth touch (had lots of tourbulences) (almost 2 years of development (and still to come more time... hope not big!!) to reach this position)
-
hehehe.. and a new video: anyway... "soon" will be another video of the FMS functions. The sorther the "soon" word will be if I test the plugin I have today and test everything conected between FMS Autopilot and MFD (PFD) is ok. After that then it will take the time for activating the Holdings page and performance.. that are done.. but still not connected. I was trying to put radar weather on MFD put everytime I put a route plan appears the damm red line so because for now it is difficult to delete it, still won't have radar on MFD. For sure on future versions (or if we find a solution, that don't want to spend too much time on that, on 1.0 version) we will include it. First testings on FMS programming comming!! The CRJ is making its first official flights (after performance already done lot ago).
-
Still some of them to do... Mostly ended the most important ones.. but still the plane cannot fly without the "little" ones. Still not beta stage. We will announce when we reach that point.
-
OT: what camera add-on used for CRJ200 videos?
Japo32 replied to riccardo74's topic in Canadair CRJ-200 - Released!
mmmm I don't remember if with Pilot view I can move the camera with arrow keys. I think yes..... but I usually move with trackir. Sometimes I make movements with keys on cameras.. but movement are very linear.. so I don't usually do. -
OT: what camera add-on used for CRJ200 videos?
Japo32 replied to riccardo74's topic in Canadair CRJ-200 - Released!
ah.. yes yes.. I forgot.. Pilot view.. of course. But just because the behaviour of TrackIR with Pilot View is better than with default x-plane. -
OT: what camera add-on used for CRJ200 videos?
Japo32 replied to riccardo74's topic in Canadair CRJ-200 - Released!
Hi!.. Well... I use the default one... BUT.... with TRACKIR. That way I have the motion like a hand camera. Sometimes I also put that nervous movement inside the video editor. Thanks! -
Working on external Textures, Metal effects.. etc.......
-
Hello, This last day my jrollon.com forum database has been like crazy sending me lots of spam emails. Hope it didn't sent to you also. Well the ones that where inside the forum because it was closed to be opened here. If you continue having that problem please let me know. I am trying to fix it. Thanks, and sorry about all that spam emails.
-
dificult to say.. it is on "free" time.. but I think 2 weeks or so. ah.. yes.. I will add more geometry there to fix the problem of ailerons!
-
yes.. thanks for your patience. All the work doing right now is performance work. We found that the way the text was implemented on displays on CRJ was bad for that performance so had to redone again.. and that means redone the displays. Of course it doesn't take the same time as the beggining but it takes its time. There are few things still to program.. but the main big part has been done. Still have to search for bugs etc.... but we are trying to work as fast (and accurate) to release as soon as we can. When it is finished. Thanks again!
-
quick testing material bright (still not put specular maps) on x-plane of the T34c...
-
Bienvenido Bravo101. Como dice Jvaldunciel este foro más bien es para soporte de mis productos, de todas formas claro está.. se puede publicar aquí lo que se quiera. Por supuesto. Gracias por el apoyo! Un saludo.
-
Ok.. thanks! now is too late to modify it.. but as soon as I can I will take a look at it.. and if I can I will modify to give you a copy without that issue. Anyway I will include also on future 1.4 version.
-
ok.. I have heart the sound you sent.. and the only think I notice is a liiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiitle "click" sound.. but I have to say some things: First of all I don't recognice the sound to be the Javelin one. Well.. I could say that is more lower than the one I have and with more sound FX that the Javelin has. Because of that I would tell you go to the sounds\engine folder and reproduce all the sounds you have there and try to identify with the one you sent me. Even also try to see if the same loop bug comes on the sounds on that folder. Reproduce them with looping (I did it while I was editing to see any glitches or bad sounds). Also see other Sounds on the rest of sound folders.... Well I don't know if the problem with you is on that little (very very very little) "click" that plays maybe 4 times. If so please identify me the sound where it comes from, because I don't know where it comes on the Javelin. If it is something more, then the problem is on your soundcard. Don't you have an integrated one to reproduce through it? and see if same problem happens?. If you have the posibility of playing the aircraft on other operating system, please do it. Or other computer. That way we will know if it is your problem or Javelin one. Maybe you have a higher response ear.. who knows? For example I have chromatoxic, a little problem with red and blue colours, who knows if also I have it with sounds! anyway.. the best method to solve problems is testings on other systems. try it. I have solved a bunch on problems with that method. best,
-
mmm.. could you please send me or publish a video (or sound) recorded from your computer how is that sound? because it is the first time someone tells me that about sound. Maybe there are more with same issue, but never heart about that. Could be from the Javelin, but 99% of cases I have heart of something odd on only one computer is not from the Javelin. Anyway.. send me that if you can. thanks
-
yes.. I would like to make a military one, to make something different.. but the problem with those planes is you need programming, and Anton and I are going to make the Airbus 320 the next with programming.. so I think still not. Unless I learn something of Lua (that is my purpose) to make very simple programming stuff. But of course first will be the A320 (well second because still there is a CRJ to end).
-
Bienvenidos! como Jvaldunciel dice, el foro más extendido de habla hispana es el de x-plane.es. este es simplemente un foro para ayuda técnica o lo que se tercie sobre los aviones que haga, y encantado estoy en respnder. Ahora me pilla un poco mal de tiempo (tengo que salir corriendo.. a comer a casa de mis suegros.. jajaja) pero el CRJ no está estancado.. solamente que la complejidad de los sistemas hace que vaya muy lento. Yo soy muy rápido en el modelado pero la programación lleva un tiempo muy grande. con decir que (puedo equivocarme) Anton me dijo que tenía cerca de un millón de lineas de código o por ahí (lo tengo que confirmar).. pero vamos.. mucho. Es por tanto una obra de los dos, en donde los dos nos llevaremos los mismos beneficios y responsabilidades aunque lo empezara yo. Decir que el FMS ya está en fase Beta. Terminado y que era la parte mas importante... pero no quiero dicir mucho más. Dentro de relativamente poco (nunca se sabe hasta donde se estira) estará esa beta.. y después la final. Bueno.. me vooooy!! ciaoo
-
more advancing on cockpit right now.. Lots of clocks Still to put some instruments and lots of little details inside....
-
our intention is yes, but we will announce to everyone. Don't worry, you will know, when it will be ready.
-
Yes.. as the real one. But for that still there is more work to do and release the CRJ that is going well.
-
Well External model is finished. For those that wonder what happens with CRJ, or A320 must say that this T34C Mentor is an individual Project while waiting for beta version of CRJ. Once we have a Beta version then my work continues with CRJ documentation and some more graphics, and finishing. Once the CRJ is out, then it is turn of the A320 continue. I remember that external model of the A320 is finished (same position as this T34C Mentor). And in the middle.. I will be making this T34... So this is maybe a long (or not.. who knows) plane to develop. It is the same case as the Seamax. So here are some pics:
-
Solved the Issue with Pyrite. Back to work again...
-
2 more advances. Slowly because not only working on this. Of course is more beautifull with coulours. That version will come....
-
Well.. right now our purpose is to end the plane with all the systems working. That is enough for now. Anyway.. what you are talking is something I think you already have. There is a x-passengers plugins around I believe.. that if it is the same as the fs-passenger one have a lot of things of what you have. About load of passengers inside the documentation there will be a loading sheet, where you have to calculate position and weight of pass, to have the CG MAC% for PERF INIT on the FMS.
-
Hello all! Because the CRJ graphics are mostly ended, and while ending system programming I was starting (as I did on the Seamax) a new "little" project. Deciding which type of plane would I do, I remembered my fun times on fs2004 with the Carenado T34 Mentor. I was beetween this, the Mooney and the Texan II. Because the Texan II. Finally I decided for the Mentor... but the "C" version. The Turbo pro version. Here is the first shoot. Still on develepment on geometry. Will go slow, because it is make on my "free" time and until the CRJ is ended.... because after that.. will come another big one. The continuity of the A320. Best!