Jump to content

Test1234

Members
  • Posts

    22
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Test1234

  1. 20 minutes ago, tkyler said:

    we are actively working on the compatibility update.  Jan is testing the flight model and I'm hunting / fixing any of the 3D oddities found from the recent conversion to new 3D tools.  Its job #1 at the moment, especially with 11.50 final getting closer.

    -tkyler

    VIDEO PLZ

  2. On 6/14/2019 at 10:12 AM, Litjan said:

    Ok, then I am out of ideas. You are the only one out of several thousand users reporting this problem, so I assume it is something unique to your setup. I would suggest removing all add-ons, third-party content and plugins and checking again with a vanilla X-Plane installation. If that runs ok, add your addons in again to find out which one is causing the problem.

    Other than that I have no suggestions. Cheers, Jan

     

    "Only one out of several thousands" Shows how out of touch you are with the community. It's a problem with the New Xenviro 1.10 version, everyone has it.

    • Downvote 1
  3. On 8/25/2018 at 1:42 AM, GuyFly said:

    Can tell you now, your more then likely not going to get any information until its worth telling. They are busy with their real life jobs and other factors. You will more then likely will find out more when Cameron announces it.

    I'd be cool to atleast know whats being worked on or what has been done so far. We're Customers we paid over 70Dollars for this plane.

  4. Hi, could the IXEG team give an Update as to whats going on right now? Are New Features still being Developed? Seems to me like IXEG is dead, no major Update since release. the FMC has gotten barely any attention, VNAV is bad(Yes i know that its also bad on the real 73 but it doesnt loose its mind when entering a new alt cstr) and the PROG page is still not fully done, no HOLD or ABEAM legs. Looking at the "Things that are not going to be in V1" list theres not been much done considering this plane has been out more than 1 Year. Im sure the community would appreciate a Update from IXEG. Thanks alot.

  5. On 21.3.2017 at 4:00 PM, stolowski said:

    I second some of these observations. I love this plane and the potential it has, I bought it a few weeks after the initial relase and was initially blown away by the "how it feels" - until I started experiencing issues with FMC (Gizmo soft crashes etc., still present as of today). I know many people are extremly happy hand-flying this plane, but I on the other hand enjoy playing with and learning FMC - and FMC is not stable enough yet in my opinion, especially if one is still learning and making mistakes in its programming (as I do).

    One lesson I learned in the last few years after purchasing a few famous X-Plane airliners (such as those from Flight Factor) is it takes several months for them to stabilize and get proper fixes - I hope this is going to be the case too with this IXEG model; seeing the team is active on the forum I'm pretty positive it will. One thing I'd like to see is more frequent minor updates - with the great update system of this 737 I'd really love to see it used to deliver us even tiny fixes on more frequent basis.

    Having said that I keep my fingers crossed for IXEG team and really look forward to see what this model becomes in the upcoming months!

    Yeah agreed, especially stuff like the FMC bugging out, VNAV incredibly buggy and the Gizmo crashes. Otherwise it's actually an amazing plane! but it's really hard to enjoy it with such huge issues as named before. i hoppe the update will be out in a Month or two, that would be absoloutley amazing :D

    • Upvote 1
  6. 9 hours ago, Yidahoo said:

    Sorry maybe you misread this "

    • A multitude of fixes to FMS stability and LNAV performance"

    Multitude: dictionary definition in this context - a great many.

     

    I'm on about the Missing Features, HOLD, OFFSET, PROG page, etc. and VNAV Improvement, in the current version if you change anything in the flightplan whilst the FMC is in the DES Phase your VNAV will just give up and not function properly anymore. imo this is a massive Deal Breaker (and yes i know all that talk about how rl pilots don't use VNAV because ATC vectors them, but face it, it's a sim, you don't always have ATC so you do rely on VNAV, and also, if VNAV is never used i'm sure boeing would have Omited it, it's there for a Reason.) Anyway thanks for your Effort IXEG Team, hope you guys will keep working on the Classic and maybe in the future an NG :)

    • Upvote 1
    • Downvote 1
  7. 40 minutes ago, Morten said:

    It's not that simple.

    1. Slats, they tend to move the center of lift forward (chord extended forward)

    2. Fowler flaps.  For the first 2-3 detents they extend backwards extending the chord aft moving center of lift aft.

    Typically this results in a pitch down because the flaps extend more than the slat and CoG moves backwards. so kind predictable stuff so far aerodynamically speaking. (but as discussed with a 707 pilot somewhere here slat and flap type also play a role and the 707 pitches up)

    However, when extending further, F15+ things get more complicated

    3. Huge lift increase 

    4. Huge drag increase

    5. Flap starts "curling forward" again, CoL forward

    6. Center of gravity

    7. Gear drag

    Is the center of flap/gear drag above or below the aircraft vertical CoG? Below -> pitch down, above -> pitch up.  Soo.. when talking about flap pitching moments on aircraft, you cannot generalize.  It depends on unique factors for each aircraft.  Either you need to do some very hard engineering calculations with data you probably don't have, or listen to experienced in type pilots.

    Also, when testing this in sim you need do some very precise flying by the book, also recommended done by real pilots.

    M

     

     

    Gotcha, Thanks for the Reply and Clarification :)

  8. 12 minutes ago, Sopwith said:

    Interesting. But as your flaps go down lift increases which could pitch you up. I will go and load it up and have a play. 

    And as the Lift Increases the Downwash will also Increase, Lift and Downwash are Proportional to eachother because Downwash is a product of Lift. and the aft movement of the CP should cause a Nose Drop AFAIK, you can see this effect really well on GA Planes, for example on the Piper Cherokee,Archer its Really Obvious.

  9. 38 minutes ago, Morten said:

    Hi, Merry xmas and welcome to the forums

    The flap pitching moments have been fine tuned to our 6000 hrs in type pilot (Jan) preferences for each flap setting.  Not sure what your background in the classic is, but judging by my notes on this, you two disagree on atleast parts of the behavior, also your observations are not consistent with what we have actually modeled, so please clarify your background and re-check your observations.

    M

    Not Rated on the 737CL, but to my Understanding, normally on a plane like a 737 aerodynamically When you extend the Flaps the Downwash will be increased and that will move the CP Aft causing the Nose to Pitch Down, or am i mistaken?

  10. Hey there, i'm really loving the Flightmodel on the IXEG great job! :) Just something i noticed though, Normally with the Flap Extension the Nose should drop and with Flap Retraction the nose should go up, however i noticed the IXEG has a diffrent Behavior. From Flaps 1-5-10-15 The Nose goes Up when extending the Flaps, and when going from Flaps 15-25-30-40 The nose Initally Drops then instantly goes Back up again.

    Merry Christmas to everyone and sorry for the sketchy username.

×
×
  • Create New...