Jump to content

PGleize

Members
  • Posts

    4
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by PGleize

  1. No worries happy hunting these damn bugs ! It is the perfect 737 sim so far.
  2. Dear Jan, Sorry if my comments sounds picky. I am an aviation enthusiast and really don't consider any competition between products or platform. To me you did a really great job in capturing the spirit of the 737 and your flight model is really enjoyable. In fact I appreciate the hard core approach you had on this study sim and hope it will help to bring a new standard in simulation. i wish you a bug free day Philippe
  3. Hi Morten ! I tested pitch and flight path angle and deduced AOA assuming angle between wing and fuselage is 0. The average offset between tables is approx 1 deg and seems fairly constant, so looks like a quick fix to be better. Things may be a tad more hard for glide path at light weight. To me the debate XP vs FS is more and more meaning less now that external FM in both world exist. Only the result and quality have a sense. Concorde on Xplane is one of my dream Cheers, Philippe
  4. Dear IXEG, First of all, congratulations for the release of this wonderful simulation ! The job you have done is impressive and it made me going seriously on XP10. It's a real joy to fly and to see that systems interacting realistically such as landing lights wattage impacting electrical sources loads. As I am keen on flight modeling and aircraft performance and because you use your own model, I carried out several tests vs FCTM of the 737-300 to check the basic aero model. It turned out that you the model is quite close to the real thing. However I noticed 3 small gaps you could fine tune : - the wings generate too much lift: IXEG AOA are always below FCTM AOA by almost 1 deg - this discrepancy may affect induced drag as a side effect. It seems that you fine tuned drag so that descent path match at heavy weight (121 000 lbs). If you carry out a 80 000 lbs descent test, a slight gap in flight path from FL 200 start to be visible. - braking distance: I used unfactored figures at max manual braking + rev + spoiler. Landing distance are shorter than what FCTM says. I dunno if it's reverse thrust or wheel braking that is too strong. Further investigation is required there. - 1 Engine out performance is quite good as you fall into an acceptable error margin for N1. A gap start to arise at high altitude and high weight (15000 ft/135000 lbs) but this may link to lift/issue cited above. I didn't have much time to check engine model, but will do as soon as I can. Please, take it as constructive critcism. I really enjoy your bird and wih you a great success. Philippe IXEG 737-300.xlsx
×
×
  • Create New...