Jump to content

Compares of reality and two sims


geofa
 Share

Recommended Posts

A shot of a trip I did last week acting as pic for a friend who needed to build cross country time for an ifr rating.

Crossing the Ohio river just north of Louisville, Kentucky:

Real shot:

Fsx:

Xplane:

Landing at kdkx (Knoxville Downtown airport)

Real:

Fsx:

Xplane:

A video I took of landing there in my Baron two weeks ago (the opposite runway but more spectacular):

Landing at Crossville, Tennessee:

Real:

Fsx:

Xplane:

post-276-131369568579_thumb.jpg

post-276-131369568593_thumb.jpg

post-276-131369568608_thumb.jpg

post-276-131369568621_thumb.jpg

post-276-131369568635_thumb.jpg

post-276-131369568648_thumb.jpg

post-276-13136956866_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They both have their good and bad points. I actually prefer the Crossville on xplane just cause the trees for me look to "neon" and the xplane water/trees look more natural to me.

However, your point I think is right on-the fs landclass is vastly superior-especially in cities. Xplane could use some big improvements here imho.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...