Clive Posted December 29, 2016 Report Posted December 29, 2016 Has xplane 11 been restricted on fps while testing beta versions ?? Quote
crisk73 Posted December 29, 2016 Report Posted December 29, 2016 Don't know if fps are restricted on purpose, maybe not, but they're far from being optimized as of yet. Quote
Clive Posted December 29, 2016 Author Report Posted December 29, 2016 Thanks crisk. Seem to only get a max of about 30 fps no matter what settings i use .stays stable at that but i think could be alot better. Just asking around to see what other keen pilots are getting flying the ixeg. Cheers for the reply. Quote
Defiance_co Posted December 29, 2016 Report Posted December 29, 2016 (edited) Hiya, I don't get locked per say from what i see If you've added anything at all to 11 i'd remove and go flatout for a stock setup Try somewhere out of the way, maybe a small grass strip, see what fps/cpu/gpu usage looks like Using the nice nifty stock cessna would be a good choice, great on fps in 11 Then add in anything like x-enviro/smp etc and see what gives, i mean if fps take a nose dive I've found obviously the stock 11 planes i've tried so far give good fps, the IXEG 737 does too and also the Epic 1000, my other pw planes obviously need to be updated etc for 11 (obviously) as the fps drop can be noticed at times Trying to think which of my pw planes for xp10 gives me a somewhat drop in performance, i'm not sure if it's the SSG 747 (xp11 will have a v2 version) or the FF 767-300er (also due an xp11 update) But i think out of my pw ones those can take a fps hit Tony Edited a slightly harsh wording about performance, needed to as only one plane so far as i know is out for xp11, so a bit harsh to mention a performance hit when actually they weren't coded for xp11 lol ........... Edited December 29, 2016 by Defiance_co altered text Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.