Jump to content

Plane design: stick to the book or freestyle a bit?

Lukasz

By Lukasz
in General Discussion

 Share

Do you consider as acceptable to add some features not present on a real plane, in order to enchance "gameplay" and "fun factor?   

11 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you consider as acceptable to add some features not present on a real plane, in order to enchance "gameplay" and "fun factor?

    • Yes, I want to have as many possibilities as I can (within reasonable range).
      0
    • Yes, but only small enchancements that do not impact general plane "realism".
      9
    • No, let's stick to the reality only.
      2

Recommended Posts

Lukasz Newbie

Lukasz

Posted
Posted

Recently I've read some interesting materials, as well as I had equally enlightening conversations with various individuals, more or less linked to aviation. The three polls I've started are direct results of these events and some thinking about it from my part. I'm really interested in these matters, so I ask for as much votes as possible :D Thanks in advance.

This poll is not only about X-Plane. Think of the enchancements as adding carrier hook to F-16, JATOs to C172, G1000 avionics to Tiger Moth or steerable front wheel to Mentor, just to name some either minor or extreme "addons".

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...