Leaderboard

Not today, but saturday. Flying solo on B-LUV, Cessna 172R Tried a camera setup, but accidentally put the camera on portrait instead of landscape so it missed my face Cockpit before preflight Port Shelter Harbor, tracking westbound 1500 feet Turning to fly back eastbound at 1000 feet ICC It's pretty amazing, haze and clear skies all in one day.

ok got it. It doesn't matter if it is useful or not. You do not have any technical background on ils. It should be there because you see it on FS2004/P3D/FSX (which are all the same by the way) and you like it. I recommend you to open a feature request ticket to Laminar to explain them they must mimic MSFS because that is the world standard. Entirely disagree, in the real life all that information is part of the ils procedure chart not a nav map.

Water reflection -> Complete Means: "Draw double the number of Objects" -- once above the horizon, once in the reflection. You effectively aren't running "mega tons" objects, you're now running " 2 x Mega Tons" Object drawing = Heavy on CPU already. Object drawing + water reflections = 2 x Heavy on CPU - Ck.

An update to this... MaxWaldorf finally responded via email with everything necessary to move forward, so this 'update' will be available to all customers. I was not going to get into this further, but I believe some people should be made aware given a recent post by Tony Altimini (MaxWaldorf) in his support thread for this add-on about what really happened (and yes, the reason it was not out yet to X-Aviation customers even though he provided a package a week ago is because of his lack of reply to e-mails or questions). In short, all Tony (MaxWaldorf) was ever asked to do was simply answer two direct questions that never got directly answered over the course of many emails. Sadly, he tended to ignore some emails instead (on purpose). If he did reply, he would evade the simple distribution term questions and sign off his e-mails with things like: "Show is over... Close the curtains." I'm not sure what provoked this arrogant side, but I tried numerous times to keep him on track and just answer the two simple questions so we were all on the same page. The questions revolved around compensation for the package (basically saying we could distribute without compensation to him) where MaxWaldorf simply needed to reply back stating he was good to have us distribute with no money owed to him (we are a payware store, after all), and the other clarifying his preferred method of distribution for this file since some things were contradicting (MaxWaldorf started off discussions saying he wanted the package in a separate file, while Javier was saying he wanted it in the User Modification folder within the package). We wanted to ensure we were respecting his distribution wishes and not stepping on any toes, so clarification was necessary for reasons like Ben's post above since X-Aviation is not the author of the package. I'm not sure why it had to take this long for such simple and straight forward speaking to be had from MaxWaldorf, but it did! All we wanted from the get-go was to be on the same page, with clear terms, and smooth sailing. Simple. Unfortunately the process was made hard for unknown reason, but oh well, it's done now. We'll do our best to get this out soon!

From UTube