Jump to content

IXEG 737 Screenshots - December 16th


Cameron
 Share

Recommended Posts

01001001 01110100 00100000 01110111 01101001 01101100 01101100 00100000 01101110 01101111 01110100 00100000 01100010 01100101 00100000 01110010 01100101 01101100 01100101 01100001 01110011 01100101 01100100 00100000 01101001 01101110 00100000 00110010 00110000 00110001 00110101 00100000 01100001 01101110 01111001 01101101 01101111 01110010 01100101 Hahah :P

 

http://binarytranslator.com/

 

(put binary to text!)

 

Making such a statement, do you have any kind of source? I think it's a bit unfair to post what can be read out as semi-official announcements when the team seemingly is working harder than ever to get the product out at this very moment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

01001001 01110100 00100000 01110111 01101001 01101100 01101100 00100000 01101110 01101111 01110100 00100000 01100010 01100101 00100000 01110010 01100101 01101100 01100101 01100001 01110011 01100101 01100100 00100000 01101001 01101110 00100000 00110010 00110000 00110001 00110101 00100000 01100001 01101110 01111001 01101101 01101111 01110010 01100101 Hahah :P

 

http://binarytranslator.com/

 

(put binary to text!)

What a complete waste of the internet. 2015/2016, doesn't matter so long as it is as good as it can get. (no need to convert text)

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

You will soon be able to put our flightmodel to the test :)

 

We are planning on providing you with the information and tools you need to by yourself VERIFY how accurate our flightmodel aerodynamics and engine model are.

No need to take our word for it anymore.

Basically we want to educate those interested in basic aerodynamics.  We put huge efforts into the flightmodel, but it's really hard for a regular user to really know.

Up until now it has been really easy for a designer to throw out claims about their flightmodels.  Very few have the data or knowhow to question them anyway.

These are some of the claims that are out on the popular XP products website today;

 

"..Accurate flight model, as close as it gets to real performance."

"..Precise flightmodel..."

"..Accurate flight model tuned by pilots.."

"..Realistic flight model..."

".. you can be sure that the xxxxxx is at least 95% accurate to the real aircraft.."

 

But, do they all hold what they promise?  Probably not...! Numbers don't lie, they are not subjective, so we are also considering releasing necessary data and instructions

for you to check on those aircraft as well.  You have the right to know.  We'll see... ;)

 

It's a bit like the VW fuel scandal where they claimed to have alot better numbers than what they really do and the customers have no way of knowing.

 

But for now, focus is getting the aircraft done :)

 

 

Wow!! That would be a great tool for X-Plane.  I would be willing to pay for software that would actually compare any payware aircraft side by side to the real numbers.

Your 737 Classic is looking amazing.  You say it's a "work in progress", but I don't see where it would need any improvement.

 

Bob

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both CDUs are fully independent, including having functional EXEC buttons.  However, there is only one FMC. 

I know that. You missed the point.  Tkyler in previous video regardsing route editing sad that right EXEC button is not working, and by looking in this cockpit picture we see now that he managed to get it fix. Thats progress in developement if you ask me. That was my point .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's such a beautiful flight deck, absolutely stunning texturing and attention to detail. That's my opinion anyway.

Keep up the good work guys! :D

 

I agree with you, IMHO it's going to be the BEST VC we can see in XP, and for sure is going to be much better, because we only see it in screenies or videos, I can't wait to jump into it, just in front of me, just 30 cms, a whole experience in my 21'' screen!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...