JetNoise

Blame Laminar ;-) Its their G1000 ... JetNoise

had one of these as well and learned that this could be a graphics card issue. I installed the latest from nVidia and it (probably) repaired it. Managed 7hrs (5+2) without CTDs (5hrs was with inflight refueling ;-) for stability-tetsting purpose ) JetNoise

Hi, you guys are using Navigraphs simlink by chance? JetNoise Gesendet von meinem SM-G925F mit Tapatalk

You need a Button (preferable on your controls) to *toggle* into reverse thrust. Once toggled you are in that taxi /reverse range and you simply move out of it with thrust increased at a certain point. BTW isn't that covered in one of the built in tutorials ;-) ? JetNoise Gesendet von meinem SM-T810 mit Tapatalk

Use the *taxi range* also for slowing down after landing cause it introduces a lot of drag. Reverse idle is not necessary most of the time (dep on runway length available) Saves you money for brake pads as well ;-) JetNoise Gesendet von meinem SM-T810 mit Tapatalk

Its all about landing speed and keeping the attitude. (aural warning - air speed gives a clue as well.) As with all, it needs practice, practice, practice ;-) JetNoise Gesendet von meinem SM-T810 mit Tapatalk

Laminar G1000 - missing features. I believe, theres not much Totoritko can do. (except waiting for Philipp (LR) to update it) JetNoise Gesendet von meinem SM-T810 mit Tapatalk

Never had this. v1.1, 11.26 JetNoise Gesendet von meinem SM-T810 mit Tapatalk

and it is now confirmed ;-) Ignition switches back to AUTO, even when the a/c is left with IGNITION to OFF JetNoise

;-) in your OP you did not state that you left it *off*. That makes the difference.. JetNoise Gesendet von meinem SM-T810 mit Tapatalk

Click the bezel of the keyboard, it will pop out. Use even your physical keyboard to type. JetNoise Gesendet von meinem SM-G925F mit Tapatalk

Range can differ due to various reasons AND that IS modelled in the TBM ;-) JetNoise

Hi, best a dev will look at this, but since some people end up with this CTD and from what i read its something messing / changing with this 2018-11-01 00:16:37 TBM900[except.c:282]: Something reinstalled our exception handler, replaced it with 0000000000000000 So, check your 3rd party plugins to be the cause (maybe) Loaded: G:\X-Plane 11/Resources/plugins/HangarOps/64/win.xpl (benjaminwhitehead.STMA_HangarOps). Loaded: G:\X-Plane 11/Resources/plugins/HeadShake/64/win.xpl (com.simcoders.headshake). Loaded: G:\X-Plane 11/Resources/plugins/Little Xpconnect/64/win.xpl (ABarthel.LittleXpconnect.Connect). Loaded: G:\X-Plane 11/Resources/plugins/RealWeatherConnector/64/win.xpl (Sundog.MetarBridge). Loaded: G:\X-Plane 11/Resources/plugins/SilverLining/64/win.xpl (SilverLiningV4.Clouds). Loaded: G:\X-Plane 11/Resources/plugins/TerrainRadar/64/win.xpl (drgluck.plugins.terrain_radar). SKYMAXX ?? JetNoise

Didn't see that behavior. As long you are on a inbound course to an active leg it should catch. AP on, NAV on, GPS mode (magenta) active. Or use the Direct to.... Next thing: maybe the G1000 did not sequence the waypoint correctly since you passend it already, When arming NAV (GPS) Watch closely what (active/armed) indications are on the PFD. Short video could shed light to what is wrong... JetNoise Gesendet von meinem SM-G925F mit Tapatalk

Doesn't make sense to spend time into developing flightmodels for any beta of XP. And i am 100% ;-) that they don't JetNoise Gesendet von meinem SM-T810 mit Tapatalk