I want to add to the praise - besides the systems depth and complexity, the flight model is *chef's kiss*. My first landing with it was the best first landing I had with any plane, and I didn't just disconnect at minimums, I flew it in manually from like 1500ft. It was stable, responsive and well behaved. It was far from butter, in fact it was probably quite firm, but I felt I was in control.
I was recently very disappointed with the Q4XP, it seems whenever I disconnect AP on landing in it, the plane tries to spiral out of control and kill me, and the throttle response feels erratic and very difficult to control the speed (never had this issue with the Majestic in the old FSX).
The Challenger feels a lot easier to control on landing in comparison. I feel in real life it should be opposite, since the Challenger is smaller, more slippery and a lot more powerful in terms of power/weight, but I guess here the difference in the flight modeling is evident...