Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
CharlieZulu

Night lighting, flood/dome

8 posts in this topic

Seems as though the "green flicker" instrument panel flood lights are a bit too bright. Its hard to get the green light to show on max setting because its washed out by the white light.  I feel that the xplane10 setting was great, however the xp11 is just a little bit off.

Does anyone else agree?  

Also back panel lighting seems a tad too dim, even after the latest patch. Anyway we can brighten it up just a hair more?

Thoughts?

 

Edited by CharlieZulu
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, CharlieZulu said:

 I feel that the xplane10 setting was great, however the xp11 is just a little bit off.

Does anyone else agree? 

+1

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess Charlie Zulu means backlighting or gauge lighting. I'm pretty sure this is X-Plane 11 at play and not IXEG. 

 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/17/2017 at 1:56 AM, Morten said:

IXEG policy is to let our real pilots have the final saying in subjective matters like this

I am a pilot, I've also jump-seat on many occasions in 737 and I can assure you the lighting in x-plane is off. 

 

 Whats the point of a forum then if you don't want our opinions?

Edited by CharlieZulu
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, CharlieZulu said:

I am a pilot, I've also jump-seat on many occasions in 737 and I can assure you the lighting in x-plane is off. 

 Whats the point of a forum then if you don't want our opinions?

Your opinion is noted and you *might* have a point, but like I said, in subjective matters like this that are hard to document (and you haven't)  there are as many opinions as there are users, also within the team.  You are not that I'm aware a 737CL pilot with 6000+ hrs in that cockpit which one of our team members and a a couple of bets testers are so we let them have the final say.  Making decisions by the "forum poll" method without any documentation is not IXEG style way of doing things.

 

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, Morten said:

Your opinion is noted and you *might* have a point, but like I said, in subjective matters like this that are hard to document (and you haven't)  there are as many opinions as there are users, also within the team.  You are not that I'm aware a 737CL pilot with 6000+ hrs in that cockpit which one of our team members and a a couple of bets testers are so we let them have the final say.  Making decisions by the "forum poll" method without any documentation is not IXEG style way of doing things.

 

Throw in end user light conditions with regards to monitors, gamma, room lighting, natural lighting, glare, etc, and all bets are well and truly off.

The dynamic range of the average monitor is like looking at the world through a drinking straw.

3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.